注:本平臺(tái)為第三方資訊平臺(tái),不是院校官方,網(wǎng)站內(nèi)所有信息只做參考,并不代表院校官方,招生信息以官方最新信息為準(zhǔn),如果不知怎么找官方,可以咨詢在線客服尋求幫助。
?
保障性住房政策的演變:法國與美國的比較
主講人:Edward G. Goetz 美國明尼蘇達(dá)大學(xué)Humphrey公共事務(wù)學(xué)院教授、城市與區(qū)域規(guī)劃研究中心主任
主持人:劉志林 清華大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院副教授
時(shí) 間:2015年6月16日 星期二 下午2:00-4:00
地 點(diǎn):清華大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院302教室
主講人簡介:
Edward G. Goetz教授是住房與社區(qū)發(fā)展政策領(lǐng)域的知名學(xué)者,他的研究領(lǐng)域主要集中在種族與貧困問題如何影響到美國的住房政策設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)施。Goetz教授同時(shí)是明尼蘇達(dá)大學(xué)城市與區(qū)域規(guī)劃研究中心主任、并曾任Humphrey公共事務(wù)學(xué)院副院長及城市與區(qū)域規(guī)劃碩士項(xiàng)目主任。他也曾任職于多個(gè)與保障性住房政策和社區(qū)發(fā)展有關(guān)的地方與全國性機(jī)構(gòu)的指導(dǎo)委員會(huì)。Goetz教授在保障性住房政策領(lǐng)域已出版多本專著,包括《 Clearing the Way: Deconcentrating the Poor in Urban America》(2003, Urban Institute Press), 《Shelter Burden: Local Politics and Progressive Housing Policy》 (1993, Temple University Press), 《The New Localism: Comparative Urban Politics in a Global Era》(1993, Sage Publications)。他最新出版的專著《New Deal Ruins: Race, Economic Justice, and Public Housing Policy 》研究了美國公共住房政策如何逐步解體的(2013, Cornell University Press)。
Professor Edward G. Goetz specializes in housing and local community development planning and policy. His research focuses on issues of race and poverty and how they affect housing policy planning and implementation. His most recent book, New Deal Ruins: Race, Economic Justice, and Public Housing Policy (2013, Cornell University Press), examines the dismantling of the public housing program in the U.S. Goetz is the Director of the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs at the University of Minnesota, and co-Director of the University-Metropolitan Consortium. He has served as Associate Dean and as Director of the Masters of Urban and Regional Planning program at the Humphrey School. He has served on a variety of local and national advisory committees on issuesrelated to affordable housing and community development. Goetz is also the author of Clearing the Way: Deconcentrating the Poor in Urban America (2003, Urban Institute Press), Shelter Burden: Local Politics and Progressive Housing Policy (1993, Temple University Press), and co-editor of The New Localism: Comparative Urban Politics in a Global Era (1993, Sage Publications).
講座摘要:
Social housing in France and public housing in the U.S. have followed similar trajectories. Both countries embarked on their publichousing efforts in the mid-20th Century only to see their efforts become associated with high levels of social dysfunction. In the U.S. publichousing was concentrated in inner-city areas while in France it was clustered outside of the city. Nevertheless, in both places public housing communities evolved into high-poverty, marginalized, and stigmatized neighborhoods. Edward Goetz looks at the similarities in the provision of public housing in France and the U.S., especially at how these communities concentrated racial and ethnic minorities, and became associated with urban decline, and served to mask deeper social, economic, and political issues in each country. Even the strategies for restructuring public housing are similar across the two settings, suggesting a more universal set of political processes driving the provision of housing for lower-income citizens.
免責(zé)聲明:本站所提供的內(nèi)容均來源于網(wǎng)友提供或網(wǎng)絡(luò)搜集,由本站編輯整理,僅供個(gè)人研究、交流學(xué)習(xí)使用,不涉及商業(yè)盈利目的。如涉及版權(quán)問題,請聯(lián)系本站管理員予以更改或刪除。
想咨詢的同學(xué)請掃描二維碼添加好友